ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE：To provide assistance for the smooth implementation of classification management policies of retail pharmacies in Guangdong province and the scientific supervision of retail pharmacies by relevant departments. METHODS ：In this study，key interviews were conducted among 68 interviewees，involving experts from Guangdong drug regulatory department ，head of retail pharmacies and research experts on relevant policies of universities. The current situation ，problems and suggestions of the classification management policy of retail pharmacies in Guangdong province were summarized. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS ： The implementation of the classification management policies for retail pharmacies in Guangdong province operated well. Drug regulatory authorities at all levels could conduct daily supervision in accordance with policy requirements. Retail pharmacies operated in strict accordance with the classification management policy and established a relatively complete quality management system. However ，there were still problems such as difficulty in policy implementation ，insufficient policy clarity ，increased regulatory pressure and regulatory risks from government regulatory agencies ，rising operating costs and increasing pressure in retail pharmacies，the large gap of licensed pharmacists ，difficult to investigate and deal with “affiliation of certificate ”behavior，and difficult survival for remote pharmacies ，and the impact on the convenience of drug use of the public. It is suggested to improve the content of the policy ，introduce related supporting measures ，strengthen the construction of the supervisory team ，increase policy publicity，improve the ways and methods to investigate and deal with the “affiliation of certificate ”behavior of licensed pharmacists， and help retail pharmacies to diversify their operations and chain operations. It is recommended that relevant government departments should further improve the content of the policy and actively adjust the supervision methods to make the policy better implemented.
ABSTRACT
Objective To master the status of iodine content in drinking water and iodine nutritional status of population before and after the salt iodine concentration reduction in 2012 in Meizhou City, and to provide a scientific basis for safety assessment of salt iodine content after adjustment of the policy.Methods Using stratified random sampling method, drinking water samples were collected, and iodide content was measured by cerous sulfate catalytic spectrophotometry.Urine samples of children aged 8-10 were collected, in which the iodide content was quantitatively tested by arsenic cerium catalytic spectrophotometry.Samples of household edible salt were collected to determine iodine content by direct titration in 2012 before (September 2011), and after the salt iodine concentration reduction (September 2012 and September 2013).Results A total of 422 water samples were measured, the median iodine content of water was 2.4 μg/L.The water iodine median was 2.1 μg/L in centralized water supply (n =163),and 2.9 μg/L in decentralized water supply (n =259), the difference was statistically significant (U =-2.526, P ＜ 0.05).Totally 800 and 803 urine samples of children aged 8-10 were collected in 2011 and 2012, median urinary iodine was 216.5 and 207.5 μg/L, respectively, which were higher than that in 2013 (n =807, 190.0 μg/L, x2 =17.040,24.868, all P ＜ 0.05).Urinary iodine ≥300 μg/L ratio was significantly decreased (2013 than 2011 and 2012,19.3％ (156/807) vs.26.5％ (212/800) and 24.5％ (197/803), x2 =6.363, 11.695, all P ＜ 0.05), and urinary iodine ＜ 100 μg/L rose in the proportion (2013 than 2011, 18.0％ vs.13.5％, x2 =6.045, P ＜ 0.05).A total of 2 410 household salt samples were tested, and the coverage rate of iodized salt, iodized salt qualified rate, the consumption rate of qualified iodized salt were all higher than 98.8％.Totally 800, 803 and 807 salt samples were collected in 2011, 2012 and 2013, the salt iodine medians were 31.0, 27.7 and 25.4 mg/kg, respectively, the difference between the salt iodine medians was statistically significant (H =91.422, P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions Iodine excess risk is significantly decreased, and the level of iodine nutritional status of the city's population is appropriate after the salt iodine concentration reduction in 2012.The salt iodine concentration adjusted is suitable and safe.